A CaRT Trustee replies - Contingency Fund

 

The Contingency Fund

Orph Mable (narrowboatworld 10th October) suggested the contingency fund (if unspent) might be put in a deposit account for future emergencies. I'm not keen on that. I want to maximise the money spent on maintaining the canals and navigable rivers so I'm not keen on the 'put it in a bank account' idea. In recent years, breach repairs etc have been met from current income anyway.

The contingency concept works as follows. Each year a budget is drawn up on how the c. £150m anticipated income is to be spent; of this, £2m is put aside for contingencies. The plan is always to use that £2m. Underspending on maintenance would be a mistake. The only question is what it will be used for—this year on the Trent & Mersey breach and Mon & Brec repairs, last year on trees. So it's not a question of there being an unused balance at the end of one year which is carried forward to the next year.

Each year starts afresh with a new £2m contingency. As Orph Mable suggests, the Trust does think that emergencies can happen unexpectedly—one of the reasons for the contingency.

Specific purpose funds

I can reassure Orph Mable (narrowboatworld 10th October) that as with other charities the Trust will be showing in its accounts the use of Specific Purpose Funds where they are over £10k—so the Trent & Mersey Appeal will be shown.

Tell us if you don't get replies

David Carden (narrowboatworld 15th October) says some of the waterway managers are not interested in 'us navigators but would prefer voles, badgers and weeds to boats'. That's not my experience and I have met many of the Trust's key people over the last few months, particularly those at the front end of maintenance work.

There are also many unseen experts who add value to the work that boaters see on the ground. Of course, the Trust has to be mindful of its responsibilities for the environment, and much of it is dictated by legislation so it's all about finding the right balance. From what I have seen, the vast majority of Trust employees, whatever their role, understand the importance of finding that balance and work hard to achieve it. Look at the approx £100m spend I've mentioned earlier. That doesn't mean everyone will agree with all actions taken but I'm very concerned to read what David Carden says. Can he help me by giving examples?

(This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) Then I can try and do something about it.

David Carden also says he doesn't get replies to criticisms. All users' notifications of problems should get a reply—it helps if they are politely worded! If you don't get a reply, then email the waterway manager. If that doesn't work, then email:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. the Operations Director (as Pam Pickett did—narrowboatworld 29th September—she got a reply). And if that doesn't work, let me know!

Want to be an extra pair of eyes and ears?

David Hymers (narrowboatworld 22nd October) suggests regular boaters might become designated observers and asks for an email address to which comments can be sent. The easiest way to find that is to type into the search box of the Trust's website the waterway area you want,  and there you'll see an email address and who the manager is; if you want to contact him/her direct, then it's the usual This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. format.

The page also shows which waterways they deal with—if you're not sure where the boundaries are. Having the single email address David suggests would mean having a bod to service it—I'm not keen on increasing the overhead. Information sent to the waterway office will get a reply from a real person.

I've said it before and I'll say it again—I'd welcome boaters being an extra pair of eyes and ears for the Trust. Trust staff may well know of matters when you report them—but you may be the first to notice a problem, especially if it's underwater. All matters get noted and boater comments help in sorting out the priority in which matters are dealt.

And if you are able to offer Trust staff a journey on your boat, please do so. As you and I know, the perception from a boat is often different from the towpath.

Tailpieces

Did you hear about the sponsored car wash which led to £250 being raised for the Trent & Mersey Breach Appeal? Birkenhead YMCA each year take about 500 homeless and disadvantaged people on their boat on the Trent & Mersey. They have unofficially adopted the Dutton/Middlewich length and care for the mileposts and pick up litter—this has spin-off effects in changing attitudes to pollution and caring for their environment and helps their progression back to 'mainstream society'. Their guys were so anxious to do something about the breach that they raised £155 from a sponsored car wash with the YMCA making it up to £250 (see my post, narrowboatworld 5th October). Now, I reckon that's a really good example of how wide are the appeal and benefits of the waterways.

Have you signed up for the Trust's new 'Boaters Update'? At present, it goes to about 8,300 people. Because of the law, the Trust can only send it to people who give their details—so if you want to get it, tell This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I was pleased to see David Lyneham-Brown (narrowboatworld 29th October) had given local Trust office details to a couple of potential volunteers. I fear his suggestion of all 35,000 licence holders being sent volunteering leaflets would mean a lot of paper being used but I'll ask about the renewal form telling people about downloading a form from the website.

The Trust is keen on having volunteers—remember that, apart from my personal knowledge of what volunteers can do, we also have as Trustees the deputy director of Oxfam and the recently retired head of the WRVS (65,000 volunteers). Increasing the number of volunteers will be part of the evolution I mentioned above.